Posted on January 15, 2008 by kangaroodort
I lifted this from Jeff Paton’s website. He gives an answer based on his commitment to the governmental view of the atonement, which allows him to bypass the force of Owen’s argument.
As I have stated before, I am not (at this time) dogmatic about views of atonement. I do, however, favor the penal satisfaction view [...]
Filed under: John Owen, atonement, penal satisfaction, tough questions | 26 Comments »
Posted on December 17, 2007 by kangaroodort
Studying the atonement can be mind numbing. We all generally believe that Christ died for our sins. That is the common ground. The difficulties reside in the details. How does Christ’s death translate into forgiveness of sinners? Why did the Father accept the Son’s sacrifice in our stead? What exactly was accomplished at the cross? [...]
Filed under: atonement, penal satisfaction, trinity | 26 Comments »
Posted on December 5, 2007 by kangaroodort
Calvinists often argue that God’s love has failed if Christ’s atonement was made for all and yet not all are saved. I find it strange that Calvinists, who are so quick to criticize Arminians for holding to a man centered religion, argue that unless man responds to God’s love in saving faith, then His love [...]
Filed under: Christmas, atonement | 30 Comments »
Posted on November 9, 2007 by kangaroodort
Dan is doing a nice series on Owen’s arguments in The Death of Death in the Death of Christ over at Arminian Chronicles.
Filed under: John Owen, atonement, penal satisfaction | 5 Comments »